Reproductive Rights Bill 2024

Private Member's Bill by Mrs Tanya August-Phillips MLC

Brought before Keys by Mr Lawrie Hooper MHK and Dr Michelle Haywood MHK

Reasons for the Bill

A desire to allow same sex couples to register births.

The parent-child bond is uniquely special, regardless of the formation of that family. 

In the Isle of Man, the issue of same-sex parentage initially arose in 2014, due to a same-sex female couple who wished to register their child in both of their names as parents on their child’s birth certificate but were unable to. 

On the face of it, it seemed like a simple tweak to legislation concerning the registration of births, however, the registration of same-sex parents hangs on a broader and weightier issue of modern-day parentage: fertility and surrogacy law, and parental responsibility.

Why Mrs August-Phillips MLC?

Mrs August-Phillips was Department of Health and Social Care (”DHSC”) Member responsible for legislation from 2021-2025. This matter sat as a final priority on a programme filled with essentials at the beginning of this administration.

There was concern DHSC wouldn't get to it, so she offered to work on it alone as a private member, consult on it as a private member, and brief DHSC as it developed before it reached Tynwald's branches.

Central Registry's part...

The Chief Registrar identified that amendments would need to be made to the Civil Registration Act 1984.  He also identified that if changes were made to the specific definitions of ‘mother’ and ‘father’ and in respect of references to ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ in Part 9 of the CYPA (Fertilisation, Surrogacy etc.), to recognise that same sex couples may wish to have children using modern fertilisation and embryology methods, this would provide appropriate definitions for the anticipated changes to the 1984 CR Act.

DHSC's part...

Accordingly, the DHSC, which has responsibilities in respect of the 2001 CYP Act, was asked to facilitate the necessary amendments to that Act.

Neither the 2001 Act nor the 1984 CR Act include any provisions for amendments to be made using secondary legislation.

Part 9 of the 2001 Act is based on similar provisions in the 1990 UK Act.  This Act was significantly amended by the 2008 UK Act, which also included a number of additional provisions relating to parenthood in cases involving assisted reproduction, and both have since been further amended via secondary legislation.

In reviewing the UK legislation, it was identified that none of the changes since 1990 had been applied in the Isle of Man, and as a consequence Part 9 of the 2001 Act was now quite different, and out-of-date, when compared to UK legislation.

Keeping pace...

It was concluded the Isle of Man needs to align with the UK, by introducing:

·       new provisions relating to the meaning of ‘father’ and the donation of sperm and eggs; including other circumstances around ‘fatherhood’ involving same or different sex parents and assisted reproduction, via artificial insemination, embryonic transfer, egg donation etc.;

·         extended provisions dealing with parental rights on the death of a partner;

·         new meanings of marriage, civil partnership and the register of births;

·         and, new provisions relating to parental orders in respect of a child.

An option to amend the 2001 Act in respect of the pressing matters was considered, but it quickly became apparent making minor changes when more substantial changes were required was not ideal.

On the basis of the extent of the changes, and a general view that Part 9 does not fit particularly well in the 2001 Act, it is suggested that the revised and new provisions might all now be brought together into a standalone Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill.

It was suggested that the restated and updated surrogacy arrangements contained in Part 9 of the 2001 Act would also sit more comfortably with the Human Fertilisation and Embryology legislation, rather than being left in the 2001 Act. The proposals were, therefore, drafted into a stand-alone Bill.

Working with stakeholders, and informed by experts...

Much of the policy work on this proposal was initially scoped out by officers working for the Attorney General’s Chambers in 2017, and has been broadened by Miss August-Phillips, working with stakeholders, including; Registries, DHSC, Public Health, Manx Care, and the Cabinet Office.

Versions of the Bill were scrutinised with expert input from Mrs Michele Maroney MBChB FRCOG: Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist at Noble's Hospital, and Professor Richard Anderson from the Centre for Reproductive Health at the University of Edinburgh.

Resulting from this work, leave to introduce for the Bill was sought from Legislative Council on 8th March 2022, and 4th April 2023, respectively on the basis that policy is agreed with the DHSC ahead of drafting for the Bill, which would otherwise take years to appear in either Branch.

A public consultation was conducted on the Government Consultation Hub between 15 August 2023 and 29 September 2023. The outcome of the consultation shows overwhelming support for the Bill (137 R).

Should these rights be automatically granted to both same-sex parents?

There were 136 responses to this part of the question.

Option

Total

Percent

Yes

116

84.67%

No

20

14.60%

Not Answered

1

0.73%

Do you think Manx law should be updated to recognise and accommodate the rights of same-sex parents?

There were 137 responses to this part of the question

Option

Total

Percent

Yes

116

84.67%

No

21

15.33%

Not Answered

0

0.00%

Are you content with the prohibitions and offences in connection with embryos, germ cells, gametes, and genetic material within the Bill?

There were 114 responses to this part of the question.

Option

Total

Percent

Yes

93

67.88%

No

21

15.33%

Not Answered

23

16.79%



 Impact Assessment

1. Business

It is not believed that the proposed changes have any impact on businesses.

2. Government

Whereas requests to register same-sex parents are rare, Government risks ongoing criticism and embarrassment if same-sex parents cannot be legally recognised on the official record of a child’s birth.

By comparison, the registration of babies with same-sex parents has been permitted in the UK by Government since 2009.

3. Social

The Bill is likely to have a positive impact on couples who cannot conceive naturally as they will be able to be legal parents from birth, regardless of the way the child was born.

Although this change cannot be said to promote population rebalancing, it addresses an issue that could be seen as a hindrance to parenthood.

4. Environmental

It is not believed that the proposed changes have any environmental impact.

5. GDPR

It is not believed that the proposed changes have any Data Protection impact.

6. Equality

The proposed Bill intends to address the flaws of the current legislation in that respect by enabling same-sex couples to become parents in other ways than adoption.

Concurrence

With no impact to government finances, Treasury concurrence was granted.

The Bill

Part 1 - Introductory

This contains the short title and the commencement provisions, definition of terms which apply to the Bill, and it provides that a person who has a conscientious objection need not participate in any activity governed by Part 2.

Part 2 – Human Fertilisation and Embryology

Part 2 of the Bill updates and replaces the provisions in Part 9 of the Children and Young Persons Act 2001. It comprehensively regulates the creation, use, and storage of embryos and gametes, setting strict licensing requirements for fertility treatment and prohibiting certain activities outright, such as the placing of non-human embryos or gametes in a woman.

Importantly, it provides for conscientious objection, allowing individuals to opt-out of activities governed by this Part if they hold such objections.

The DHSC is given a pivotal role outlining its functions and responsibilities in regulating these activities. Clause 7 mandates the Department to maintain a code of practice for licensed activities, ensuring proper conduct.

Clauses 8 through 13 establish prohibitions and define key terms such as “permitted egg,” “permitted sperm,” and “permitted embryo.” They also create offences for contraventions, ensuring robust enforcement of these prohibitions.

Clause 14 deals with licensing for otherwise prohibited activities, while Clause 15 addresses regulations for parental orders involving mitochondrial donation. Clause 16 pertains to the regulations regarding the storage and examination of gametes or embryos.

Part 3 – Parenthood in Cases Involving Assisted Reproduction

Part 3 introduces significant updates to determine legal parenthood in cases involving assisted reproduction. This includes provisions for recognising the parenthood of a mother's female partner under certain conditions, ensuring parity with opposite-sex couples.

Clauses 17 through 38 elaborate on the conditions and processes for recognising parenthood, addressing both married and unmarried couples, same-sex couples, and situations involving deceased partners. These clauses ensure that all parties involved in assisted reproduction are accorded their rightful parental status, while also providing clear guidelines and safeguards.

Part 4 – Surrogacy Arrangements

Part 4 re-enacts and updates the provisions related to surrogacy. It defines key terms and establishes that surrogacy agreements are unenforceable under Manx law. Clauses 45 and 46 prohibit commercial activities related to surrogacy, creating criminal offences to uphold these prohibitions. Clause 47 restricts advertising related to surrogacy, with certain exceptions for non-profit organisations.

Clause 48 enables the Department to align Island regulations with UK legislation on surrogacy, ensuring that we stay current with developments in this area.

Part 5 – Closing Provisions

Finally, Part 5 includes Clauses 49 to 51, introducing consequential amendments, transitional provisions, and the power for the Department to make further regulations to fully implement the Act.

What happened in LegCo?

This Bill was seconded by Mrs Dawn Kinnish MLC, who had prior knowledge of the need for these changes as Equality Officer in the Cabinet Office.

LegCo had an Evidence Stage - encouraged by the mover: testing the Bill, and undressing technical aspects - ensuring it's right and proper for the Isle of Man.

This resulted in amendments made on the mover's behalf and in collaboration with Mr Rob Mercer MLC:

Clause 4  is the ‘Interpretation’ clause in the Bill – it includes such terms as’ female germ cells’, ‘person responsible’, what it means to ‘store’, and what is meant by ‘processing’.

There is an amendment which future proofs the definition of ‘UK licence’.

Professor Richard A Anderson PhD: Professor of Clinical Reproductive Science at the University of Edinburgh, suggested the change at Evidence Stage.

Clause 5 provides that a person who has a conscientious objection need not participate in any activity.

There's a suggested amendment to this clause following consultation with the now former Health Minister, Mr Lawrie Hooper, and Dr Michelle Haywood.

It was felt the Assisted Dying Bill had better provision for conscientious objection than the wording in the 2008 Act of UK Parliament, which this derives from.

Clause 6 sets out the general functions of the DHSC in relation to the human fertilisation and embryology activities governed by Part 2.

It was thought by former Health Minister Lawrie Hooper, and experts (following further consultation), that the department should by regulations prescribe fees (rather than simply ‘if it sees fit’).

This is subject to Tynwald approval.

Clause 9 clarifies the meaning of “permitted egg”, “permitted sperm” and “permitted embryo” for the purposes of clause 8.

A tidying up amendment – it removes a contradiction of terms in the original wording regarding permitted eggs and sperm deriving from induced stem cells.

Clause 13 creates offences for the contravention of the prohibitions in clauses 8, 10, 11 and 12.

This makes a change to the defence of those accused of malpractice under the Bill – ensuring those who exercised due diligence, and took reasonable steps at the time an alleged offence was committed, are provided with the best possible chance of vindication.

Clause 14 makes provision for the licensing by the Department of certain of the activities otherwise prohibited under clauses 8, 11 or 12. At present, no licences have been issued in the Island.

There is a consequential amendment to that which was outlined in clause 13 to make changes to defence wording.

Clauses 21 and 22 make provision about the agreed fatherhood conditions.

In consultation with stakeholders regarding the introduction of the concept of 'M' a ‘man’ in this part of the Bill, it was thought best the narrative would be improved if it were made reference to at a slightly earlier point.

Consequential amendments in clauses 24 and 25.

Clause 39 sets out the categories of couples who can apply for a parental order where a child has been conceived using the gametes of at least one of the couple, and has been carried by a surrogate mother.

Married partners and civil partners are able to apply, as can unmarried opposite-sex couples or same-sex couples.

An amendment follows consultation with Dr Michelle Haywood, and commentary in the Evidence Stage of this Bill from Professor Anderson.

As introduced, it would rule out a donor embryo. This is also connected to Mr Mercer's interest in allowing for double donation: this means two parents of a child not biologically connected to the child are permitted donation on behalf of both.

Clause 40 enables single applicants to apply for a parental order where a child has been conceived using the gametes of the applicant, and has been carried by a surrogate mother.

A gamete is a reproductive cell. Female gametes are called ova or egg cells, and male gametes are called sperm.

This is a consequential amendment following agreement from Council on allowing double donation in Clause 39.

Each amendment was orchestrated with the drafter by Mrs Tanya August-Phillips MLC, and moved in agreement and following collaboration with Mr Rob Mercer MLC.

All amendments resulted from consultation with Mrs Maroney and Professor Anderson.

The Green Paper encompassing these amendments now sits with Keys, with Mr Lawrie Hooper's name as proposer on the back of the Bill.

Outcomes...

This Bill is crafted to respect and uphold equal rights, ensure clarity and fairness in legal parenthood, and provide robust regulation of reproductive technologies.

I urge you to support this Bill, which promises to bring significant advancement to our legal framework: ensuring it is equipped to handle the complexities and challenges faced by modern families, and modern best practice.

Gura Mie Ayd.